Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:54:26 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature-poor default WPA userland software (hostapd, wpa_supplicant) configuration -- is it inetntional? Message-ID: <CAJ-VmombqZGXVqrteU9u%2BeZTkFvymYQ1LBeHLeC3SuK3KbZ7vA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201208241951.06694.bschmidt@techwires.net> References: <199007581.20120824202155@serebryakov.spb.ru> <201208241910.35576.bschmidt@techwires.net> <CAJ-Vmon2Bxn1r8QDohKxePYE=b2ctpA4ArfAqNeO314PyR0Lug@mail.gmail.com> <201208241951.06694.bschmidt@techwires.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 24 August 2012 10:51, Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net> wrote: >> There's also likely a whole bunch of driver and stack things we need. >> Eg, we need correct VLAN handling (which is fine, we SHOULD have it in >> net80211, I just don't think it's been tested in a long time.) There's >> also off-channel traffic support which I know we don't currently do. > > Na.. not VLAN over WLAN (well, yeah, that needs to be looked into > also), hostapd is able to shove STAs into different VLANs (on the wired > interface) based on Radius rules. Right. I wonder what the "vlan" tag in the net80211 node is for. Is that for VLAN over WLAN? Yeah, being able to map a STA into a VLAN would be cool, but then we'd have to figure out where to do the bridging and how to tell net80211 to do that mapping to vlan subinterfaces.. Adrianhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmombqZGXVqrteU9u%2BeZTkFvymYQ1LBeHLeC3SuK3KbZ7vA>