Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 07:46:44 -0700 From: James William Pye <flaw@rhid.com> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Standards <freebsd-standards@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: /bin/test asdf -ge 0 Message-ID: <1094654804.85018.94.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200409071845.i87IjAu6099894@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <1094566670.80264.78.camel@localhost> <20040907163809.M20166@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <200409071845.i87IjAu6099894@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 11:45, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> I agree. I believe that an interpretation request would receive the
> "the standard is silent and no conformance distinction can be made"
> (and therefore FreeBSD's implementation is not incorrect). It's
> instructive to contrast the description of expr(1), where the standard
> makes it very clear what constitutes a number.
I think that you are likely to be correct here. Perhaps I will send a
clarification request noting the constrast you mentioned between test(1)
and expr(1) to the OpenGroup list Harti referred to. I think I will also
mention arithmetic expansion, as I think the issue exists there as well.
--
Regards,
James William Pye
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)
iQEVAwUAQT8bVKZpiPNPvu8yAQJe/wf9E/sino/JDLCE8hFVDtoK2VGEuiV6dYxw
OkCP/kwEbjVnMTRsmeQkMq6g2IDnndx4S2QZzANTEQnKtAKFpyYAj9yH8Dixgo5C
RCnlbrr3awMAKiYaZVoQERBlUpiSohENzOf5qVGDTdpeSFP7f+wVQMgAj0VUWL4k
RuDjXfJm8zqlre11S9G+tnKXuGt5d+yg7X5FQdZaKHqx+2vG62zS8X1K+PXT1Ltc
JMscCe9xq972wHAOPx4j06T50oGVnqQXm07Owg/bZhG9DOTLGbuw6UDV4xxhMLYM
VMFIo1HIWkSV+4zqUZjFwFsEALAQxU2eYnaKf+CCWIzuo078loPUdQ==
=8xdA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1094654804.85018.94.camel>