Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1999 14:12:45 -0400 (EDT) From: rdkeys@unity.ncsu.edu To: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) Message-ID: <199904211812.OAA09041@cc01du.unity.ncsu.edu> In-Reply-To: <19990421174502.ECEC61F2A@spinner.netplex.com.au> from "Peter Wemm" at Apr 22, 99 01:45:01 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Matthew Reimer wrote: > > Great work guys! It almost seems that -current is more stable than > > -stable! > > Matt > > Funny you should mention it. I've heard this from a number of people over > the last week.. One has even suggested using a particular known-good 4.0 > snapshot in preference to a 3.1-stable for a production system...... > > Cheers, > -Peter Are there any particularly good snapshots one should try? I have a couple of spare boxes on the home net that I am willing to try or crash, for the fun of it. I was using the snap from about 3 weeks back on my home web server and it seems rock solid, but I am running rather plain hardware. Bob Keys To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904211812.OAA09041>