Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:36:22 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/161825 linux-f10-flash11 port Message-ID: <20111029233622.07911997@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK2KDUtMkJ9GeTF3=KXg%2B=G9R-rHMg7DpwDdWi2bMsw3=g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgnhkbj9BAM4k=XwKPLZ2TWVfmkmU4S=a4eekyhB4Any-A@mail.gmail.com> <assp.0282356641.55bc183383f3eca0c89f4036e92a3766@ringofsaturn.com> <CA%2BtpaK2KDUtMkJ9GeTF3=KXg%2B=G9R-rHMg7DpwDdWi2bMsw3=g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:05:35 -0500
Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Rusty Nejdl
> <rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > 2) This doesn't conflict with flash10.
> >
>
> galacticdominator% pkg_info -W
> /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
> pkg_info: both linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r183.10 and
> linux-f10-flashplugin-11.0r1.152 claim to have installed
> /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
>
> /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so was
> installed by package linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r183.10
>
Yes, I noticed this, too. Perhaps both ports could be modified to
install to /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin${version} (10 or
11) instead?
Of course, if version 11 will just wind up superseding version 10, then
that's probably not even necessary (myself, I simply uninstalled the
older version and reinstalled the new one).
And still no sign of those old annoying artifacts! Yes! :-)
--
Conrad J. Sabatier
conrads@cox.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111029233622.07911997>