Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:14:14 +0330 From: "Babak Farrokhi" <babak@farrokhi.net> To: <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: WITHOUT_DEBUG flag for x11-toolkits/gtk20 Message-ID: <001101c6362c$21b97120$eb0ba8c0@ELF>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Folks,
I have always been wondering why this port does not support standard
WITHOUT_DEBUG flag (as many ports support this flag, and once you set
WITH_DEBUG=no in /etc/make.conf, those ports while enable debugging
instead!). So I just added this simple modification to the Makefile to honor
the WITHOUT_DEBUG knob. (I am not sure, maybe there was a good reason for
using WITH_DEBUG instead of WITHOUT_DEBUG).
--- gtk20.patch begins here ---
diff -ruN gtk20.orig/Makefile gtk20/Makefile
--- gtk20.orig/Makefile Mon Feb 20 17:48:23 2006
+++ gtk20/Makefile Mon Feb 20 17:52:25 2006
@@ -51,6 +51,11 @@
# on the command-line.
# Set to minimum if you want to send in a backtrace; set # to yes if you
want to know what gtk thinks it's doing.
+.if defined(WITHOUT_DEBUG)
+.if ${WITHOUT_DEBUG:L} == "yes"
+WITH_DEBUG= no
+.endif
+.endif
.if defined(WITH_DEBUG)
.if ${WITH_DEBUG:L} == "no"
CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-debug=no
--- gtk20.patch ends here ---
Any opinions?
--
Babak Farrokhi
babak@farrokhi.net
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001101c6362c$21b97120$eb0ba8c0>