Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:29:29 +0200 From: Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@obspm.fr> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@obspm.fr>, nicodache <nicodache@gmail.com>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LVM2 under FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <20080908112929.GD1204@freebsd.chezmoi.fr> In-Reply-To: <20080908132406.J27739@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <82029aed0809070709n65f67632qcfd4cd3fbdda22f@mail.gmail.com> <20080907232120.2567d5ce.freebsd@edvax.de> <20080908073503.GD34913@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20080908110152.I27211@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080908112346.GB1204@freebsd.chezmoi.fr> <20080908132406.J27739@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 08/09/2008 à 13:24:51+0200, Wojciech Puchar a écrit > >>> Yes of course ZFS is very powerful FS, but I'm not very sure it's ready (on > >> > >> you meant very powerrequiring ;) > > > > Yes...but can you say if we have many power (RAM, CPU, etc...) we can use > > if you just want to waste that power - you probably could. I don't very like the «probably» ;-) IMHO ZFS is something amazing, I'm using it on Solaris, and whe you have ~30 To on the server you cannot use UFS or ext3 or anything to need a fsck (event it's not every time, when one of our linux server need to make his fsck that block everything). So I'm very happy the ZFS is on FreeBSD, and I'm waiting when ZFS become stable and could use in production. All of that to say it's not a «waste that power» for me if ZFS working. Regards. -- Albert SHIH SIO batiment 15 Observatoire de Paris Meudon 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26 Heure local/Local time: Lun 8 sep 2008 13:26:32 CEST
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080908112929.GD1204>