Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:13:01 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: hiding e-mail adresses needed badly Message-ID: <20031016071301.GQ88224@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <43618.1066226536@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20031015133634.GA37556@nagual.pp.ru> <43618.1066226536@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--I4VOKWutKNZEOIPu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [imho this belongs on -chat] On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 04:02:16PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > And I personally think that by "hiding" the email addresses, you concede > defeat to the spammers. I don't want to let a bunch of low-life > con-men decide how I can and should use the InterNet. Hear hear, I wish more people would take this POV. Hiding your email address is a constant process that you can never stop doing; and once you've made o= ne mistake the spammers get you anyway. Better to implement filters and never = see them. And if they still get through, just hit 'd' (the spam I get is identifiable by subject 99% of the time), and move on... --Stijn --=20 "I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not so sure." --I4VOKWutKNZEOIPu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/jkT9Y3r/tLQmfWcRApEdAJ9H3+os67WCsOBn/U5h6bXNMc59nACfUk0l S5ctYgrDzIx/AFfmOWAooZk= =ERPE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --I4VOKWutKNZEOIPu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031016071301.GQ88224>