Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:20:07 -0400 From: Jason Unovitch <jason.unovitch@gmail.com> To: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> Cc: Justin Hibbits <jrh29@alumni.cwru.edu>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: r288669 breaks ports building with USE_GCC=yes Message-ID: <CABW2x9pTqoKi7eBB1e6XiiXCR5EUM0=LRC5wF2fmALCxotS=yA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <561C1523.7080200@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAHSQbTC1ReVYiwcd6HxbteOyDeOxt1_ydz3zcFR3_Loc_X748A@mail.gmail.com> <561C1523.7080200@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hello; > > On 12/10/2015 02:56 p.m., Justin Hibbits wrote: >> >> The default ports gcc for USE_GCC is still 4.8, which does not support >> -fstack-protector-strong. This breaks several ports including (from >> my poudriere run): libfpx and qt4-sqlite3-plugin. >> >> - Justin > > > r288669 only applies to base. It was tested with an exp-run and there were > no > failures so this is something wrong in your setup. > > This said, --stack-protector-strong was being considered for ports, so > portmgr > should consider changing USE_GCC to 4.9 before that. > > regards, > > Pedro. > > _______________________________________________ I've been toying with a patch to use -fstack-protector-strong when available with the base compilers as well as detecting the ports GCC version and either using -fstack-protector-strong or falling back to -fstack-protector. I haven't put the patch up for review yet but in my opinion we should have lang/gcc be 4.9 by default before we can realistically consider an exp-run. Jason
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABW2x9pTqoKi7eBB1e6XiiXCR5EUM0=LRC5wF2fmALCxotS=yA>