Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:19:22 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org> Cc: Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net>, rrs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 trivial problems / notes Message-ID: <20071211181921.GC1712@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <200712111153.lBBBrmYl001945@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <fjho0k$hdc$1@ger.gmane.org> <20071210002131.GA74729@kobe.laptop> <002801c83b05$56ab20b0$3a2a13ac@staff.ktc.lan> <20071211004258.GA11140@kobe.laptop> <20071211004531.GB11140@kobe.laptop> <200712111153.lBBBrmYl001945@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2007-12-11 12:53, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org> wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> > Does the following look ok? >> A more complete patch, touching GENERIC for all architectures would be >> like the following patch, of course: > > Looks good, it would be nice if someone commited that. > ( I too got bitten by SCTP, when commenting out INET6 (which > I didnt want, while leaving in SCTP for later removal, as I > didnt know if something else new might depend on SCTP). Thanks! :) I am not sure if SCTP can work, or if it's expected to work at all, in INET6-only systems, so it's probably worth waiting for rrs@ to review the patch first. I'll commit it once we get his approval.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071211181921.GC1712>