Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:46:09 -0400
From:      <kris@ixsystems.com>
To:        "'Garrett Wollman'" <wollman@csail.mit.edu>, "'Cy Schubert'" <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
Cc:        <freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: CFT: FreeBSD Package Base
Message-ID:  <081a01d4ff84$fa4f3d50$eeedb7f0$@ixsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <23752.34284.56207.860696@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
References:  <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <201904291441.x3TEfMid072751@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <201904291931.x3TJV73d079802@slippy.cwsent.com> <23751.25464.908633.101215@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> <8B10CAFD-88A1-4DAD-92C2-93F5DE4B3402@cschubert.com> <23752.34284.56207.860696@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org <owner-freebsd-
> pkgbase@freebsd.org> On Behalf Of Garrett Wollman
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 1:29 PM
> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
> Cc: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: CFT: FreeBSD Package Base
> 
> > Which begs the question, if we're simply replacing freebsd-update and
> > it does most of what we want why the extra effort?
> 
> Anyone who isn't using a completely stock make.conf/src.conf is already
> replacing freebsd-update, and it would be much *less* effort to have only
> one mechanism to distribute software rather than two.
> 
> I'd like to have a better installation process, too, because that would make it
> much easier to redeploy servers.  But most of our servers are file servers
> with unique user data so "redeploy" is not a relevant operation much of the
> time.
> 
> -GAWollman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pkgbase
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pkgbase-
> unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


This was a big motivator for us to merge base pkgs into poudriere. In my career I've written 4 build systems that all do some variation of buildworld/kernel + poudriere + create ISO + create updates. I'm sure plenty of other FreeBSD consumers have done the same, and frankly its getting old. At least now I'm down to poudriere + create ISO only. 

And my sympathies to anybody still having to use freebsd-update as part of their custom updating process 😉


-- 
Kris Moore
Vice President of Engineering
iXsystems, Inc
Ph: (408) 943-4100
Ph: (408) 943-4101
The Groundbreaking TrueNAS M-Series -
Enterprise Storage & Servers Driven By Open Source





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?081a01d4ff84$fa4f3d50$eeedb7f0$>