Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:33:04 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Mipam <mipam@ibb.net> Subject: Re: ULE status Message-ID: <200502081333.08964.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net> References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart3669521.eIOTLYlc9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote: > Hi, > > I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch. > Beneath is one of them: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html > > Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not? You can now compile a kernel with options SCHED_ULE again. How well it work= s=20 is for yourself to determine :-) (I've been using it on my UP machine here= =20 since yesterday only). =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart3669521.eIOTLYlc9d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCCLGEXhc68WspdLARAs9YAKChI/7pvB5Kq4Mhw6926hyDZVRsKQCfcOV6 OrwCu/p6cB3ZnaG6voH8KXk= =ZdfH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3669521.eIOTLYlc9d--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502081333.08964.michaelnottebrock>