Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:02:36 +0100 From: Herve Quiroz <herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr> To: Tomas Verbaitis <tomasv@megalogika.lt> Cc: liukang@bjut.edu.cn, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5 startup and shutdown.. again Message-ID: <20051108160236.GA5400@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> In-Reply-To: <20051021070012.GA6786@megalogika.lt> References: <20051020175328.GA7205@megalogika.lt> <20051020221548.GA3979@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> <20051021070012.GA6786@megalogika.lt>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:00:12AM +0300, Tomas Verbaitis wrote: > I still think my proposed change still should be applied as it at least > gets the default situation right, when both tomcat55ctl and rcNG script > refer to the same JVM. The "administrative" approach to this problem > would be only to put a warning near the place where > jakarta_tomcat%%TOMCAT_VERSION%%_java_home is defined. "Technically" i > aggree that it's better to get rid of tomcat55ctl as a program, no > matter how convenient and usual it was. We now have reached the timeout for maintainer feedback on this topic. I was about to commit your suggested changes and then, after reading your message I was wondering whether this could be the right time to get rid of tomcat55ctl. So I ask tomcat users from this list for feedback. I would like to find out how often is tomcatXXctl used rather than the rc(8) script. After a short survey in my surroundings it seems like everybody uses the rc(8) script and thus removing tomcatXXctl would bring no harm now that rcNG script no longer uses tomcatXXctl... Hervehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051108160236.GA5400>