Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:16:09 -0700 From: "Enji Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>, freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pjdfstest integration Message-ID: <1585B8BA-5847-40B3-A655-700BD800318C@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2i6mDQCpsSWzyzkjE6WuWHsrgcXcWwr4MZZ127Bm-_d_A@mail.gmail.com> References: <aeeTmlUluD6y3VnH@nuc> <CAOtMX2jzUa56nOdnX7Yn4Rs%2BG0U3p1qSs2uA_V_pOKcoesHtyw@mail.gmail.com> <aeeorhK4k3TbmBdX@nuc> <CAOtMX2i6mDQCpsSWzyzkjE6WuWHsrgcXcWwr4MZZ127Bm-_d_A@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] > On Apr 21, 2026, at 9:44 AM, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 10:41 AM Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 09:41:31AM -0600, Alan Somers wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 9:11 AM Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, I noticed that we install pjdfstest to /usr/tests/sys/pjdfstest, >>>> but: >>>> - it's not hooked up to the test suite, i.e., >>>> "kyua test -k /usr/tests/Kyuafile" doesn't run it, >>>> - contrib/pjdfstest doesn't seem to be updated regularly, >>>> - the configuration is hard-coded, i.e., I can't easily run it against a >>>> filesystem of my choice. >>>> >>>> How hard would it be to parameterize the tests so that we can run the >>>> tests again a list of filesystems? For each filesystem we'd have some >>>> little script that sets up some scratch space, creates an empty >>>> filesystem and points pjdfstest at it. In some cases we'd need the test >>>> runner to specify some additional variables, e.g., for p9fs you want the >>>> test runner to provide a share, as we currently only support the virtio >>>> transport. I'm not sure if kyua can pass variables to a TAP test, so >>>> the solution might be to wrap each pjdfstest run with an ATF test case >>>> which handles the setup. >>>> >>>> Is anyone interested in working on these things? >>> >>> Yes, yes and yes. >>> >>> I was indeed working on a change to pjdfstest which, among other >>> things, would read a config file for each file system under test. The >>> config file specifies things like whether posix_fallocate is supported >>> on that file system and which file flags are supported. The change >>> also drastically speeds up pjdfstest's runtime. >>> >>> We did that as part of GSoC 2022. The status of the project is that >>> it's 99% complete, but requires somebody to comb through 4000 SLOC >>> line by line to make sure nothing got left out. That's very tedious, >>> which is why nobody has done it yet. I would LOVE to get it finished, >>> but I've never made the time. >>> The rewrite also relies on some ugly macro syntax. We did that >>> deliberately to save time, but it does make the code ugly, and a >>> little bit harder to review. It might be worth investing the time to >>> rewrite those macros more cleanly. >>> >>> Using the new pjdfstest, it would be quite easy to add an ATF test for >>> each file system. atf-sh would format the file system under test, >>> then call pjdfstest with the appropriate per-filesystem config file. >> >> Do you have a pointer to this work anywhere? I can't promise to >> complete it, but I'm pretty motivated to stand something up for p9fs. > > It's at git@github.com:musikid/pjdfstest.git . What do you think is > the best path forward? I could publish a 0.1 release now, and get > this into ports, while you work on the ATF part. Then we could slowly > open a series of reviews that delete the old sh-based stuff. What musikid did was a good effort, but it would make pjdfstest into a purely FreeBSD test suite since many other platforms don’t come with ATF installed on them; the project currently supports Solaris (to a lesser degree) and Linux (we still get pinged from time to time about Linux-related support requests). -Enji [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkHfexGRJ3gYRdA2gGpE5DjPsNJgFAmnnsNoACgkQGpE5DjPs NJiipw/+JqLDhbIGzY6SCtw0hwZAGtipnqvrsN0SR/f7POqnYT3ra2qlyeOT9Njb EiUltvA5ViFQoYLtZvsxSGUbb+Mqg9jwYNTNq29kPjHk5HsCqb/VjkJVRXQ0nwIh ism81ehGIixnusSyBYgwWPY8myOxsRHX2oZZ32TrSsnIgYaONyVnmeC59B6QVNKU 9qJWhYhq92qFhxlvcNwSJccGlcb8G7gkNIWS+1ehpO9Ko9KtNrLmYLe03qqCT0WS A1ncUsVbHwlV0lnG2FJCybdG2TtMd3UUnk3g2GHYT9qnFGOzGIj43y6g9njRQGEo mW+YE9dTuIGYREVsVFtSLm+tT4Ovzn+hjYfMUdedyDDXOIzE383DNepz+DVssMmo TWbFod9XKsJ20WDrHIQdZyHChbJuK4e3EBtENvjirxdbqvNsGyqUXiNYmModEo/Q sbNc3eZN/tLumkN6GMOZ64DmSFm5sJbqCT6CWlWWL5Isg2VfsdwCGEju+CqOleip lGu/bqLAC/7k8oOE9+VGBy+SkAGmmNqVgzHoNEPFTYx0ZOAp0G8Q6MubndrYrfUe ewBkegmsn9aoYmauiK7yhLHGCe4v0OiUhIDqfw3xdsSrHY/afM9AHG9PO198/HQ+ 72lrZsMeznXx46oISwpxnVAeMakGL14hXFeE7wFiNULYFCjvVVc= =7gs1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1585B8BA-5847-40B3-A655-700BD800318C>
