Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:29:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: "Greg A. Woods" <woods@zeus.leitch.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static vs. dynamic linking (was Re: Using MD5 insted of DES ...) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980422172918.523K-100000@sasami.jurai.net> In-Reply-To: <199804222056.QAA02964@brain.zeus.leitch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 22 Apr 1998, Greg A. Woods wrote: > If you're looking for a consensus, then no. ;-) > > (in certain circumstances I find any dynamic loading of code, be it > through shared libraries, or run-time loading of .o's, or whatever, to > be highly undesirable, and I think that's effectively what several other > people have concluded too) Well said. /* Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53 */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980422172918.523K-100000>