Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 04:54:48 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de> To: Wouter Van Hemel <wouter@pair.com> Cc: Bob Van Valzah <Bob@BGPBook.Com>, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de>, freebsd-doc <doc@freebsd.org>, Grog@Lemis.Com Subject: Re: Minor 'historic' flaw in FreeBSD article "Bootstrapping Vinum" Message-ID: <20020529025448.GA32765@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <1022636075.28350.49.camel@cocaine> References: <20020528222333.K25512-100000@hades> <1022625361.32852.18.camel@NewStorm.WhiteBarn.Com> <1022636075.28350.49.camel@cocaine>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Wouter Van Hemel wrote: > It's either nominative or accusative. Ablative would be 'vino', as in 'in > vino veritas', since the location is static, i.e. it's not about the > motion but the position. > > What is your real question, if it involves latin, maybe I can help out... The currently available "Bootstrapping vinum" document claims "vino" was accusative, but it's ablative (could be dative as well, but not after the preposition "in"). I'm asking for a correction, and you just confirmed that. :-) -- Matthias Andree Aliena vitia in oculis habemus, a tergo nostra. (Seneca, "de ira") To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020529025448.GA32765>