Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:19:37 +0900 From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org> To: Bryan Drewery <bryan@shatow.net> Cc: Thomas Abthorpe <tabthorpe@goodking.org>, ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Time to mark lang/ruby18 DEPRECATED Message-ID: <861u3cmdyu.knu@iDaemons.org> In-Reply-To: <20130925144423.GI74496@admin.xzibition.com> References: <20130923173906.GR95595@goodking.org> <20130925144423.GI74496@admin.xzibition.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_23_20:19:32_2013-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Great! It's fantastic to see ruby 1.8 finally go. Now, why don't we make Ruby 2.0 the default version instead of 1.9? Ruby 2.0 is highly (upper) compatible with 1.9 and there should be no reason to adopt Ruby 1.9.3 by now. Ruby 1.9 is unlikely to have any more build/platform related change that would expand supported platforms, architectures or compilers, so I think we should adopt Ruby 2.0 now that FreeBSD 10 is soon to be shipped with a new compiler and toolchain that are rapidly evolving. What do you guys think? Is there any essential package that does not run on Ruby 2.0, in which case I could help? -- Akinori MUSHA / https://akinori.org/ --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_23_20:19:32_2013-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlJnsMUACgkQkgvvx5/Z4e4G9wCfTjXLCSK8P76wY+NYQhEYqOf3 mdsAn1hy1ReOg9mXh1cJbunRtQsE0hrd =xjcD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Wed_Oct_23_20:19:32_2013-1--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861u3cmdyu.knu>