Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:58:11 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Farooq Mela <fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pthread_exit proto Message-ID: <20010304115811.Q8663@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <3AA29546.7D709D6@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us>; from fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 11:19:34AM -0800 References: <3AA29546.7D709D6@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Farooq Mela <fmela0@sm.socccd.cc.ca.us> [010304 11:18] wrote: > > Hi, > > Could someone with CVS write access make the following change in > pthread.h > > void pthread_exit __P((void *)); > > to > > void pthread_exit __P((void *)) __dead2; > > as this function doesnt return and gcc is giving me some annoying > warnings ;-) > > BTW, what is the standard mechanism for submitting a patch such as > this. I know this probably isn't the really correct place to post > this... using send-pr: http://www.freebsd.org/support.html#gnats Is '__dead2' a GNU C thing? or is in any sort of standard? Generally there's some resistance to putting GNU C specific code into the base system, is there a portable way to do this? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010304115811.Q8663>