Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:37:08 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: William Palfreman <william@palfreman.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: How much better are 64 but platforms Message-ID: <20031030223708.GA31228@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20031030220811.V367@aqua.lan.palfreman.com> References: <3FA00634.6000002@potentialtech.com> <20031030001309.GA19454@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20031030220811.V367@aqua.lan.palfreman.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:25:29PM +0000, William Palfreman wrote: > On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > I'd recommend amd64 over itanic..the latter is a vastly complicated > > processor to support, and gcc apparently does not produce very good > > code for it. >=20 > I was wondering how advanced the plans are to bring native AMD64 into > FreeBSD? Will it get into 5.x, or will be have to wait for 6-CURRENT? > I was thinking of buying one of these machines in the spring you see :-) FreeBSD 5.x has supported amd64 for months. Kris --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/oZKUWry0BWjoQKURAq9PAJ4vEfI62qz1FPqNTqK2QygMyyirxgCgzybj LkSQGRTlP+ykMZ7V6BrJuGQ= =fBiI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031030223708.GA31228>