Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 23:56:55 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: lwhsu@FreeBSD.org Cc: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: breaking modules Message-ID: <202205032157.243Lut1R083899@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Tue, 03 May 2022 20:05:41 %2B0200."
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I wrote: > > > From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org > > Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 17:20:14 +0000 > > To: jhs@berklix.com > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263758 > > > > Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > CC| |lwhsu@FreeBSD.org > > Status|New |Open > > > > --- Comment #2 from Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> --- > > Does WITHOUT_MODULES in make.conf(5) work here? > > Ouch ! Thanks ! I didn't know that existed ! I may have wasted time > re-inventing the wheel, I'll look more at both. > > PS Seems to me a whole slew of that man make.conf more properly now > belongs in src.conf ? Thanks to Li-Wen Hsu :-) I read & tested the section of /sys/modules/Makefile .for reject in ${WITHOUT_MODULES} SUBDIR:= ${SUBDIR:N${reject}} .endfor & that code works fine with both 1 & 2 modules listed. The existing code is also lots smaller than my DUD_MODULES patch, that does not use the sophistication modern bsd make ofers. So I rejected my own patch, & closed https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263758 Cheers, -- Julian Stacey http://berklix.com/jhs/ http://StolenVotes.UK Kill / remove Putin: He kills innocents & causes global grain & fuel shortage.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202205032157.243Lut1R083899>