Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:09:09 +0200 From: clemens fischer <ino-news@spotteswoode.dnsalias.org> To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JTAG recommendations? Message-ID: <5ksdk4xsa3.ln2@nntp.spotteswoode.dnsalias.org> References: <20070611214113.GC44552@tirith.brixandersen.dk> <200706120921.09263.freebsd-embedded@dino.sk> <20070612083825.GA56032@tirith.brixandersen.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Henrik Brix Andersen in <20070612083825.GA56032@tirith.brixandersen.dk>: > That's not the issue here - I was asking what other people on FreeBSD > use for their JTAG needs, seeing that OpenOCD isn't in ports I doubt > that is in widespread use among FreeBSD users (else, someone would > have submitted a port). well, i actually use the openOCD software with a wiggler. there's a small patch needed re. port-IO, which i can send you. the original is based on linux-only, which has port and value reversed, and fbsd needs different includes. Dominic Rath keeps forgetting about us, although i had sent him the patch. i think he wants something more generic than a simple "#ifdef __FreeBSD__ ... #endif" scheme. you should use the version from the SVN repo. as is state-of-the-art with fbsd, you'd have to use the right auto* version numbers for the bootstrapping. ohhh... i just noticed "svn update" won't do with my old sources. this means i'll have to checkout the entire tree again. no time for that now. regards, clemenshome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5ksdk4xsa3.ln2>