Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:42:48 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>, rsmith@xs4all.nl, lists@rhavenn.net Cc: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> Subject: Re: ntpd not removed; WITHOUT_NTP enabled in src.conf Message-ID: <4B4A1198.7040802@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <201001091108.o09B89fw036586@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <201001091108.o09B89fw036586@lurza.secnetix.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oliver Fromme wrote: > Roland Smith wrote: > > Henrik Hudson wrote: > > > Hey List, > > > > > > Among other things I have in my /etc/src.conf > > > WITHOUT_NTP=yes > > > > > > which from my understanding should not build ntpd, etc... > > > [...] > > > ntpd still exists in /usr/sbin and the man pages, etc... > > > seem to still be hanging around. Did I miss something? > > > > Adding options to `/etc/src.conf` does not remove old binaries, > > libraries or manpages! It just prevents the system from building > > newer ones. > > I'm afraid that's not true. > > When you disable something in src.conf(5), its files *will* > be removed when you do "make delete-old". > > See the file src/tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc > for all the details. It's included by src/ObsoleteFiles.inc > which in turn is included by src/Makefile.inc1 (after > /etc/src.conf was parsed by share/mk/bsd.own.mk). > > If that doesn't work for WITHOUT_NTP, then that's a bug. > Probably some entries missing in OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc. As Kenyon Ralph noted, it was discussed in the past (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-November/013561.html) Not deleting WITHOUT_ stuff is really not a bug. Deleting is some kind of undocumented feature which never worked for all the WITHOUT_ variables. Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B4A1198.7040802>