Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:44:15 -0800 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wish List (was: Re: The /usr/bin/games bikeshed again) Message-ID: <200102161644.f1GGiJR29010@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:26:18 CST." <20010216102618.A90210@hamlet.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010216102618.A90210@hamlet.nectar.com>, "Jacques A.
Vidrine" writ
es:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 06:30:27AM -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Gro
> up wrote:
> > Other candidates, Kerveros IV. Anyone is serious about using Kerberos
> > would install the krb5 port. (I don't consider heimdal a serious
> > condender, it's already a port and it should have stayed there). IMO,
> > both Kerberos IV and heimdal are just a waste of disk space).
>
> Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on your comments about Heimdal.
> There is a lot to like about it over the MIT Kerberos implementation,
> not the least of which is the fact that the MIT Kerberos license still
> does not allow export from US.
I understand it to be not a full implementation of Kerberos V. There
was some discussion about this on -stable or -security some time ago.
As you're the maintainer of both in the FreeBSD ports/source trees you
would know more about that than I do. Maybe I'm off base here.
--
Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766
Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca
Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
Province of BC
"COBOL IS A WASTE OF CARDS."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102161644.f1GGiJR29010>