Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 20:32:47 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> To: Holger Kipp <hk@intserv.int1.b.intern> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd naming of releases Message-ID: <424FE26F.9050501@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <20050403014218.GA57319@intserv.int1.b.intern> References: <3aaaa3a0503271958205ca8e1@mail.gmail.com> <20050403014218.GA57319@intserv.int1.b.intern>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Holger Kipp wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 04:58:21AM +0100, Chris wrote: > > We had this type of discussion already several times. Search the > archive for corresponding posts. This discussion is pointless and > only wastes bandwith. > It looks like that it was not accepted by somebody that ... > The real problem is that people do not read and/or think. people do not read and do not think. Nearly all other software I know uses the naming schema of alpha, beta and gamma respective final. Why should people start thinking and reading if all could be included in a single word? > A different naming scheme won't change that. > Yes, I agree. But why do you want to achieve the impossible? Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?424FE26F.9050501>