Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:46:56 +0800 From: leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw> To: Jonathan Fosburgh <syjef@mdanderson.org> Cc: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: SMBFS problems in this morning's -CURRENT Message-ID: <20040419164656.GA56629@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> In-Reply-To: <200404191136.53506.syjef@mdanderson.org> References: <200404191110.20057.jonathan@fosburgh.org> <20040419181423.H650@korben> <4083FD45.6050604@FreeBSD.org> <200404191136.53506.syjef@mdanderson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:36:35AM -0500, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote:
> I had to do the same thing this time, but I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that
> it had something to do with trying to use the previous, incorrect version of
> mount_smbfs.
>
> - --
> Jonathan Fosburgh
The new binary requires this, the old one did not. The commit message
says that mount(2) will auto-load the smbfs kernel module, but I am
afraid it's not the case.
Jiawei
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040419164656.GA56629>