Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2000 14:11:20 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Igor Roshchin <str@giganda.komkon.org> Cc: kris@FreeBSD.org, security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: advisory suggestion Message-ID: <20001001141120.A37225@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200010012109.RAA56369@giganda.komkon.org>; from str@giganda.komkon.org on Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 05:09:22PM -0400 References: <20001001012524.B9499@freefall.freebsd.org> <200010012109.RAA56369@giganda.komkon.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 05:09:22PM -0400, Igor Roshchin wrote:
> In this case, it was written, that 4.1-STABLE is fixed as of xx.xx.2000
> It's clear that it is fixed in 4.2-RELEASE (whenever it's out) ,
> but not clear about 4.1.1-RELEASE (you need to compare the dates)
>
Oh, I see what you meant - I forgot to mention this in the most recent
catopen advisory. Sorry - I'll try and remember for the future.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001001141120.A37225>