Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:06:22 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/fbm Makefile ports/math/fbm Makefile Message-ID: <7mk71vj2jl.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20040308060320.GA58705@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200403080558.i285wQOr026377@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040308060320.GA58705@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 7 Mar 2004 22:03:20 -0800,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I don't know that there's a whole lot of point in setting non-obvious
> LATEST_LINKs..their main use is to allow pkg_add -r to work for
> end-users. Users probably aren't likely to guess these values if they
> want to install the port.
Agreed.
> In cases like this the ports should probably either both be marked
> NO_LATEST_LINK, or the "most useful" port should get the LATEST_LINK
> if that's easy to arbitrate.
Okay, I'll use NO_LATEST_LINK if noone objects because I'm not sure
which port is usable or major.
--
Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc.
<kuriyama@FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7mk71vj2jl.wl>