Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:22:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net> To: koitsu@FreeBSD.org (Jeremy Chadwick) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>, "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <ml@t-b-o-h.net> Subject: Re: [freebsd-stable] Re: BIND update? Message-ID: <200807101422.m6AEMeMI095414@himinbjorg.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> In-Reply-To: <20080710141023.GA70961@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:03:24AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:25:33PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > > > > OK, thanx for clarification. I totally overlooked the updated bind port; > > > > anyhow, I use base system bind and didn't plan to change that (although > > > > it might me a good idea, as this situation clearly shows). > > > > > > You can always use the WITH_REPLACE_BASE option in the port to > > > overwrite the base system named, or use the differences in the > > > extracted tarball of 9.5.0 vs 9.5.0-P1 to update the source of the > > > base one yourself. > > > > > Shouldn't you also add : > > > > NO_BIND= true # do not build BIND > > > > into /etc/make.conf if you do, so it doesn't get clobbered? > > That would be WITHOUT_BIND=true in /etc/src.conf on RELENG_7 and later, > just for added clarification. > Thanks for the catch. I was looking at a 5.5 system I was doing that on. I haven't replaced base on my 7.0's, those were only changes to /etc/rc.conf for named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named". Tuc/TBOH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200807101422.m6AEMeMI095414>