Date: 14 Jun 2001 13:57:51 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@packetdesign.com> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need Linux emulation patch review Message-ID: <xzp7kyfff40.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <xzpk82fffn0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <200106132353.f5DNrro64784@bubba.packetdesign.com> <xzpk82fffn0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes: > Archie Cobbs <archie@packetdesign.com> writes: > > Would someone who "knows" Linux emulation be willing to review > > the patches in: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=26546 > > Yup. It has quite a few style(9) issues (though they can easily be > resolved), and I think the mapping can be greatly simplified by using > ifp->if_index as the eth unit number. Linprocfs already uses this > scheme for proc/net/dev, and it would be embarassing to have two > different and conflicting mappings. > > BTW, does Linux use the "ethX" designation also for non-Ethernet > interfaces (e.g. Token Ring)? [let's move this thread from -developers to -emulation] DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7kyfff40.fsf>