Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:35:32 -0500
From:      Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
To:        Per Kristian Hove <perhov+abuse@math.ntnu.no>
Cc:        Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Y2K wierdness??
Message-ID:  <20000118193532.J457@argon.blackdawn.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GS4.4.21.0001181105270.18853-100000@martens.math.ntnu.no>; from perhov%2Babuse@math.ntnu.no on Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:17:47AM %2B0100
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.20.0001180856020.18019-100000@tricord.system.pl> <Pine.GS4.4.21.0001181105270.18853-100000@martens.math.ntnu.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:17:47AM +0100, Per Kristian Hove wrote:
> Yes, either DOS or UNIX epoch. This output is from a really old backup, so
> I don't remember on which OS version[*] it's been made, but it goes to
> show that it's always been this way.

DOS epoch == UNIX epoch. At least, in my tests of my code that uses
time_t, they both start on January 1, 1970 at 00:00 UTC.

I used CodeWarrior Pro 2 + GCC 2.95.2. YMMV.

(Not like this really matters anyhow.. ;-)

--Will


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000118193532.J457>