Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 19:35:32 -0500 From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> To: Per Kristian Hove <perhov+abuse@math.ntnu.no> Cc: Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K wierdness?? Message-ID: <20000118193532.J457@argon.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GS4.4.21.0001181105270.18853-100000@martens.math.ntnu.no>; from perhov%2Babuse@math.ntnu.no on Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:17:47AM %2B0100 References: <Pine.GSO.4.20.0001180856020.18019-100000@tricord.system.pl> <Pine.GS4.4.21.0001181105270.18853-100000@martens.math.ntnu.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 11:17:47AM +0100, Per Kristian Hove wrote: > Yes, either DOS or UNIX epoch. This output is from a really old backup, so > I don't remember on which OS version[*] it's been made, but it goes to > show that it's always been this way. DOS epoch == UNIX epoch. At least, in my tests of my code that uses time_t, they both start on January 1, 1970 at 00:00 UTC. I used CodeWarrior Pro 2 + GCC 2.95.2. YMMV. (Not like this really matters anyhow.. ;-) --Will To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000118193532.J457>