Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 03:24:57 -0800 From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> To: "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW & IPsec tunnel mode Message-ID: <200012161125.eBGBPkP05378@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2000 09:20:40 %2B0200." <001301c0601e$34cab880$0e05a8c0@intranet.syncrontech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <001301c0601e$34cab880$0e05a8c0@intranet.syncrontech.com>, "Ari Suut ari" writes: > However, pipsecd only supports fixed keys and Kame seems more > like the future way to go. Would it be possible to enhance ipfw & kame > to work together better in same way (like having some kind of name for > each tunnel and allowing ipfw rule to use them in similar way as > 'via' is used with interfaces) ? Check the -security archives. This was just discussed about a month ago. In that thread a KAME developer explained why it cannot be accomplished. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012161125.eBGBPkP05378>