Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:47:17 -0400 From: Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Jason Unovitch <jason.unovitch@gmail.com>, herbert@oslo.ath.cx Subject: Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..? Message-ID: <CAKFCL4U9=8wJEeEJGpcHREi9r3rU6=7ZoV19y1VgpBVkQVV9Pg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150724004343.GM84931@FreeBSD.org> References: <55B17B7A.4080402@gmail.com> <20150723234805.GK84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18488.9060602@sorbs.net> <20150724004026.GA1370@lonesome.com> <CAKFCL4VVtLspj%2BRQxSHjyQxAhixPuMiQoehoA2MYWeSgqTTwAQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150724004343.GM84931@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs on a > > 2GB amd64 netbook (they mostly force zfs). I think it lasted 2 days > before > > the kernel panics started. > > > > Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM. I knew it wasn't going to fly, in fact I looked for ways to get the installer to do ufs instead because I couldn't imagine zfs being able to work in 2GB. Somehow I don't think old netbooks are in Illumos's plans. :) -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKFCL4U9=8wJEeEJGpcHREi9r3rU6=7ZoV19y1VgpBVkQVV9Pg>