Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:53:13 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: decouto@lcs.mit.edu, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/30873: ``ip'' man page does not specify byte order for ip header with raw sockets Message-ID: <20050222135313.GA81336@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <20050222134026.GE805@straylight.m.ringlet.net> References: <200502221333.j1MDXo0t086246@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050222134026.GE805@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2005-02-22 15:40, Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> wrote: >On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:33:50PM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> Synopsis: ``ip'' man page does not specify byte order for ip header with raw sockets >> >> State-Changed-From-To: patched->closed >> State-Changed-By: keramida >> State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 22 13:32:59 GMT 2005 >> State-Changed-Why: >> The RELENG_5 branch was created after this change was committed to HEAD. >> This means that the change is already in 5-STABLE, so there is no need >> to keep this PR open as "patched". > > What if Bruce meant to MFC it to RELENG_4, too, and then plain > forgot? This PR would (okay, should have) served as a reminder to > that effect... Yes, I know RELENG_5 is the official stable branch, > but is it now our official Project policy that RELENG_4 is the > official stale branch? :) Commits to 4.X are no longer possible, unless I have misunderstood the messages posted by RE after the release of 4.11. It is possible that I have misunderstood the intention of the release engineers, in which case we should reopen the PR and let Bruce handle it.help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050222135313.GA81336>