Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:18:22 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org>, Murray Stokely <murray.stokely@windriver.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/ncurses/ncurses/tinfo lib_baudrate.c Message-ID: <20020114181822.GA42572@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020114200844.C68211@sunbay.com> References: <200201141631.g0EGVXs60701@freefall.freebsd.org> <200201141640.g0EGeXk46193@bmah.dyndns.org> <20020114165847.GC41490@nagual.pp.ru> <20020114092547.P27556@windriver.com> <200201141739.g0EHdNQ46868@bmah.dyndns.org> <20020114180219.GA42412@nagual.pp.ru> <20020114200844.C68211@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 20:08:44 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:02:19PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:39:23 -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > > > > > And we still don't know what "critical" fix this includes. "Official > > > baudrate fix" doesn't say a darn thing about why this commit was > > > supposedly so important. It's not covered in the "WARNING" message to > > > -current either. > > > > ospeed termcap variable value calculation was wrong for *BSD, so any > > termcap capability which have delay, like xx=<some number>..., may produce > > wrong delay, too big or too small. > > > Wow! This was indeed important to fix. > > Could you please tell me how exactly it was broken? ospeed in *BSD is "short" in the range 0-20 corresponding to speeds 0-921600, but was assigned _without_ any conversion from full speed like this: ospeed = 460800 -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020114181822.GA42572>