Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:36:55 -0300 From: NOC Meganet <tec@mega.net.br> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Cc: smp@freebsd.org, performance@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: BIND 9.4.1 performance on FreeBSD 6.2 vs. 7.0 Message-ID: <200706140936.55916.tec@mega.net.br> In-Reply-To: <20070614084817.GA81087@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20070614084817.GA81087@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 14 June 2007 05:48:17 Kris Kennaway wrote: > 6.2 was used from CVS with libthr and the 4BSD scheduler (ULE 1.0 is > broken in 6.x). just curious what is broken because I use ULE on several servers perfectly. it seems to me that ULE is even faster on SMP when not having heavy load. Also "calcru went backwards" issues I do not get with ULE but sporadically on 4BSD scheduler kernels, specially on dualcore cpus. HM -- Prowip Telecom Ltda AS 22706 A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200706140936.55916.tec>