Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:03:21 -0500 From: Adriel Torres <ladr.torres@gmail.com> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Revisit of older discussion on Intel em0 timeouts etc. Message-ID: <BANLkTikH2QiwRsDL0mCmVANO%2B%2BkM_JrXmA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110405014825.GA3420@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <BANLkTinWxk2-0gj3NkJUvQ7rCP3bCGuE6Q@mail.gmail.com> <20110405014825.GA3420@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Would you give me more information on dc(4) link state changes? >> Can you see abnormal kernel message for dc(4)? >> I think I fixed a couple of dc(4) issues as well as bus_dma(9) bugs >> and I don't know how the link state change can happen under load >> unless it encountered watchdog timeouts or TX underun. It would be >> even better if you can try latest dc(4) in stable/8 on 8.2-RELEASE. >> >> Hello, unfortunately due to these timeouts, I had to switch the bind configuration to another BSD-based system temporarily. I would however, be happy to re-deploy the latest 8.2 Stable release and collect some more statistics or information. I will likely be able to get to this task in a couple of days or into the weekend and will update the list when I do so to see if we can't find some information. Regards, AdrieL
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikH2QiwRsDL0mCmVANO%2B%2BkM_JrXmA>