Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      20 Dec 2000 10:39:01 +0100
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Mikhail Kruk <meshko@cs.brandeis.edu>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-00:77.procfs
Message-ID:  <xzp66kfph3e.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Mikhail Kruk's message of "Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:45:01 -0500 (EST)"
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012191343530.19915-100000@daedalus.cs.brandeis.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mikhail Kruk <meshko@cs.brandeis.edu> writes:
> see you previous e-mail :) I was talking about things you loose when you
> umount procfs

I am very well aware of that.

> Apparently Star office uses FreeBSD procfs, not linprocfs (not sure how).

If linprocfs is mounted on /compat/linux/proc, StarOffice *will* use
it, as it will appear to StarOffice to be mounted on top of procfs in
/proc.

The -STABLE version of linprocfs does not support cmdline, as this is
normally provided by procfs, so Linux applications that use cmdline
will not work without procfs. The -CURRENT version of linprocfs does
support cmdline.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp66kfph3e.fsf>