Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 07:43:58 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 226122] editors/focuswriter: Update to 1.6.10 Message-ID: <bug-226122-6497-IU2JPBums4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-226122-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226122 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(gnome@ | |FreeBSD.org) Keywords| |needs-qa CC| |gnome@FreeBSD.org, | |kwm@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #17 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Request portmgr (& gnome team) advice/decision on: - INSTALL_ICONS being allowed by individual ports, without (or until) current framework standardisation (I am not aware of the current state) - In what manner INSTALL_ICONS should be used, and what considerations should be made (for example, with regard to conditional/OPTION'al inclusion). Note: The above questions are separate to the question of 'to what extent changes should be combined or separated into distinct issues (patches)' While there is a defacto lean towards isolated changes, the reality is it is not a consistently (if at all) enforced standard, nor has objective or documented measures. Participants are reminded that issue tracker content/comments become permanent and public record, and should reflect the very best of peoples abilities to remain objective, factual and considerate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-226122-6497-IU2JPBums4>