Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 10:37:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco <francisco@natserv.net> To: Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Distributed authentication. Which one? Message-ID: <20051018103540.K28109@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20051017203353.GF33270@seekingfire.com> References: <20051012234337.K63956@zoraida.natserv.net> <57416b300510142221r2c3da329o65d54cb0aa04fc73@mail.gmail.com> <20051015133148.P97899@zoraida.natserv.net> <18f601940510151547ka3573f8v2f0633010ad2874f@mail.gmail.com> <20051016010251.R90770@zoraida.natserv.net> <20051017203353.GF33270@seekingfire.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > It has some interoperability and security issues. They're solvable, IMO. Thanks for the feedback. I guess a good test is to ask.. what would you use? :-) > For example, most of the security concerns can be addressed with a > combination of transport-mode IPsec and Kerberos and I avoid inter- > operability issues by avoiding weird implementations of NIS ;-) Sounds like more trouble than it's worth. Right now I am leaning towards Kerberos or LDAP. Need to learn more about them to see their strengths and weaknesses and how it would fit into our existing extructure.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051018103540.K28109>