Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 00:52:27 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Dom Mitchell <Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk> Cc: adrian@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nice little kernel task for somebody Message-ID: <3720973B.B24B2FEE@newsguy.com> References: <E10ah5V-000Da6-00@voodoo.pandhm.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dom Mitchell wrote: > > As for making ps totally proc aware, I'm not totally sure that's the way > to go. I shall have to have a look through the archives though; I've a > feeling that this has been discussed before... DCS, The Archive Man, comes to your help. If you make ps procfs dependent, you won't be able to use it on core dumps. That's different from making procfs complete enough to support a ps. Against that there is a general Linuxism/Kitchen-Sink feeling. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3720973B.B24B2FEE>