Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:47:44 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Pieter de Goeje <pieter@degoeje.nl> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 Message-ID: <86k5e52g9b.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200808222247.00575.pieter@degoeje.nl> (Pieter de Goeje's message of "Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:47:00 %2B0200") References: <20080822184231.9ECD873039@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20080822200531.GA37157@keltia.freenix.fr> <200808222247.00575.pieter@degoeje.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pieter de Goeje <pieter@degoeje.nl> writes: > Hm would it be possible to rate limit tinderbox emails to say 1 every 15= =20 > minutes? This was quite a bunch of email :-|. Reporting the same error ov= er=20 > and over again doesn't seem very useful to me. It was already rate-limited (though more by accident than by intention) to once per target every five minutes. I've increased the interval to twenty minutes. Reporting the same error over and over again is intentional - the reason why the tinderbox was introduced in the first place is that people routinely failed to test their commits, and there were times when CURRENT was unbuildable for days on end. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86k5e52g9b.fsf>