Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:40:37 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: mike@v.gz.ru, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: uart and puc attach conflict Message-ID: <20051025.134037.33538216.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20051025174337.GA45694@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <025401c5d953$47004480$821cfa9e@mics.msu.su> <20051025174337.GA45694@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20051025174337.GA45694@xor.obsecurity.org>
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
: On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:00:14PM +0400, Mike G wrote:
: > Hello!
: >
: > I have a problem with multi-port card based on Nm9845 chip.
: > It's a card with 4 com-ports.
: > It perfectly works with puc(4) and sio(4) drivers if they compiled into
: > kernel.
: > or with puc(4) and uart(4) drivers if they loaded manualy.
: > But if puc(4) and uart(4) are compiled into kernel or loaded from
: > loader.conf - problem appears.
:
: Isn't puc superceded by uart? Why do you need both?
No. puc isn't superceded by uart.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051025.134037.33538216.imp>