Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 03:25:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233781] devel/py-freebsd: Update to 0.9.4, Fix with python 3.x support Message-ID: <bug-233781-21822-C2I28rzM3n@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-233781-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-233781-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233781 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(soboma | |x@FreeBSD.org) Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People CC| |koobs@FreeBSD.org, | |sobomax@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Open Summary|devel/py-freebsd: fix with |devel/py-freebsd: Update to |python 3.x and upgrade to |0.9.4, Fix with python 3.x |version 0.9.4 |support Keywords| |needs-patch, needs-qa --- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Thank you Maxim. A couple of review items: 1) GH_TAGNAME=3D v${PORTVERSION} - Use DISTVERSIONPREFIX=3Dv, drop GH_TAGN= AME 2) Can you provide detail or explanation (and include in the commit message after approval) of: a) the upstream change. Is it a fork, did you transfer/coordinate with perk= y to move it to GitHub? b) The patch removals. Were they upstreamed? No longer necessary? 3) Since it appears the upstream is not hosted under your GitHub account, w= ould you like to update MAINTAINER to yourself? Please include that change if so. 4) The package includes tests. Can you add TEST_DEPENDS (if necessary) and a test target to run them. Ideally this should be integrated upstream, using setup.py test (setup.py:tests_require,test_suite, et al) 5) Was Python 3 support supposed to work prior to this, but was broken? Or = was Python 3 support recently added upstream and in this version? If the latter, update the issue summary (and commit log message) to say 'Enable Python3.x support' rather than 'Fix Python 3.x support' Longer term (not for this commit), can we look at distributing/publishing t= his to PyPI (CHEESESHOP). In particular, it would be good to have a 'registered' and canonical name for this package. Right now the portname is 'freebsd', b= ut the actual upstream / distname is 'py-freebsd'. I'd go with just 'freebsd' = for PyPI, to match the current PORTNAME. It doesn't ultimate matter what the re= po name is. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233781-21822-C2I28rzM3n>