Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 12:34:53 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@ftf.net>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990716123336.24956L-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <000001bece29$22a82b20$021d85d1@youwant.to>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, David Schwartz wrote: > > > FFS is even better: it doesn't fragment. > > Microsoft swore tat NTFS didn't fragement for a very long time. It wasn't > until someone else wrote a degramenter and demonstrated that it could result > in performance gains that Microsoft was ultimately forced to admit that NTFS > might fragment a little bit, every once in a while. > > DS > Fragment a little bit, once in a while???? Holy Cow!!! It fragments quite a bit, in no time at all, and the perfomance penalty is bad. Itjust depends on whatyou do. Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990716123336.24956L-100000>