Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:58:43 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> Cc: "Ulrich 'Q' Spoerlein" <q@galgenberg.net>, Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.ORG>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG, qa@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Please test LDT patch Message-ID: <200210091558.g99Fwh4E019166@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210091450260.49535-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210091450260.49535-100000@naos.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] If memory serves me right, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I can try to check the patch above; is it supposed to fix a bug, that > is, should the situation improve using it? The patch is supposed to fix a bug, but I don't think it was for the situation you described. We were mostly interested to know if the patch caused any regressions. Knowing this is still useful, but the patch has already been committed to 4-STABLE and 4.7-RELEASE. Thanks! Bruce. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQE9pFIz2MoxcVugUsMRAiL+AKCbzqPVCiY8kpDx3THEbcj9EWvgzQCfQ6Jz osV5eKufehsGgXNiWotnleA= =zWEJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210091558.g99Fwh4E019166>