Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 21:25:19 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, KES <kes-kes@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: NEW IDEAS Message-ID: <200609072125.25957.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <19710703252.20060907212112@yandex.ru> References: <19710703252.20060907212112@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] [ Your caps-lock is broken ] On Thursday 07 September 2006 20:21, KES wrote: > Hello, freebsd-net. > > What about this? > > Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> wrote: > >>KES wrote: > >> Hello, archie. > >> > >> How about 'ALTQ' node? or may be 'queue' node > >> for packets scheduling > >> > >> in--->|policy|--->out > >> > >> policy may be CBQ, PRIO, HFSC or HTB.... > >> > >> I want this: > >> > >> in-->HTB-->out - - - in-->PRIO-->out > > > >Sounds neat.. ask around on freebsd-net@freebsd.org as there may > >be others interested, etc. The problem is, how do you classify your traffic for queueing? i.e. where and how do you decide whether to put a given packet into queue A or B? In the normal processing path, this happens inside the packet filters (either pf or ipfw at this time). On a given "firewall" rule you can decide which queue will be used for packets that match the rule (or the state created by this rule). This information is later used as the packet is enqueued in the ALTQ on the network interface. If you want a netgraph node (I belive that is what you are talking about) to do ALTQ, you need a classifier somewhere as well. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFAHIlXyyEoT62BG0RAmA4AJ9k3KsYg/nlzWddWxuTdX29mFQ06wCfQ0xQ eWU4Kd64nYI5dUskNP6leFY= =hDHc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200609072125.25957.max>