Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 10:02:47 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Subject: Re: Remote gdb ? Message-ID: <19980207100247.60298@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <199802061806.KAA10114@rah.star-gate.com>; from Amancio Hasty on Fri, Feb 06, 1998 at 10:06:31AM -0800 References: <19980206155859.02035@freebie.lemis.com> <199802061806.KAA10114@rah.star-gate.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, 6 February 1998 at 10:06:31 -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote: >> On Thu, 5 February 1998 at 20:26:13 -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote: >>> >>> Does anyone know what can cause "Reply contains invalid hex digit 116" ? >> >> At a guess, it's an overrun. I haven't been able to get remote gdb to >> work reliably above 9600 bps. In fact, I haven't been able to get it >> to work reliably at all, but at least at 9600 bps I don't have any >> transmission errors :-) >> >> Of course, I don't believe it's a hex digit at all. I'd guess it's >> decimal (0x74 hex, or 't'). Is it repeatable? From what you show >> below, it appears to be intermittent. > > Nope, gdb remote is broken on -current. Where do you get that idea from? It has numerous problems, but it definitely works. I've been using it for the last several weeks. Greghome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980207100247.60298>