Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 20:10:06 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: dg@root.com Cc: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, benedict@echonyc.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static vs. dynamic linking (was Re: Using MD5 insted of DES ...) Message-ID: <199804230110.UAA07669@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <199804230048.RAA15843@implode.root.com> from David Greenman at "Apr 22, 98 05:48:35 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Programs where it is likely slightly advantageous to link shared: > > cc1, cc1plus > > We found that compile times increased 10% when cc1 was compiled shared, so > that would not be a good candidate. > I meant with shared libs. Correction to my statements: when I said "linked shared", I meant "linked with shared libs". Linking CC1 and CC1PLUS "shared" would be terrible. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804230110.UAA07669>