Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:41:41 +0300 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: d@delphij.net Cc: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC]: flex/lex update Message-ID: <20090113134141.a87a8ecf.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <496C47CD.7030701@delphij.net> References: <20090112200128.GA85280@freebsd.org> <20090113100623.493b3b43.stas@FreeBSD.org> <496C47CD.7030701@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:37 -0800 Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> mentioned: > > My $0.02 personal opinion: if we (say, nobody among -committers@ or > someone who is actively answering PRs if any) do not intend to maintain > it ourselves, then it would be probably a good idea to make it > up-to-date with the vendor version, or rename it to something like > 'bsdlex' and teach the build infrastructure about it. Build tools > should work out-of-the-box and act similar, or at least, not very far > from other POSIX operating systems IMHO =-) > I agree, but it should be deeply analyzed what we'll receive with an updated version, and what loose. If there were local patches, they should be analyzed an reimplemented for the new version as well. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklsb+UACgkQK/VZk+smlYFQQQCfZBbsodlfXXY0IomC8MBnbDQy b5cAn1/15JmI14tQVtHKGlf/R4GBpNl5 =Yj9C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:496c6d0f967001753717818!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090113134141.a87a8ecf.stas>