Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:59:29 PST From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [cisco.external.bugtraq] Re: BoS: bind() Security Problems Message-ID: <96Jan31.165939pst.177479@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:30:09 PST." <9601311930.AA00772@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <9601311930.AA00772@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Garrett write: >It should be possible to require that SO_REUSEPORT be specified on >both the original and the duplicate sockets. In fact, Stevens says that those are already the semantics for SO_REUSEPORT. Bill
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96Jan31.165939pst.177479>