Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:56:03 +0100 From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org> To: Nat Lanza <magus@cs.cmu.edu> Cc: thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI-over-* hacks Message-ID: <20010319165603.A95194@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <uocvgp5squq.fsf@tintagel.pdl.cs.cmu.edu>; from magus@cs.cmu.edu on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:47:25AM -0500 References: <20010319151134.A89803@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> <uocvgp5squq.fsf@tintagel.pdl.cs.cmu.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Le 2001-03-19, Nat Lanza écrivait :
> FreeBSD already has an equivalent to the SCSI generic device -- take a
> look at pass(4).
Yep, I am aware of pass(4), but some closed-source software that
comes only as Linux binaries insist on having a /dev/sg device
(which, under FreeBSD, would most likely be implemented as a wrapper
around pass.)
> As far as ATAPI-over-CAM, there's been some discussion of having ATA
> become part of CAM, but I don't remember what the result of it
> was. You might want to check the list archives.
Thanks, I'll do that.
Thomas.
--
Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010319165603.A95194>